Courtesy of The Globe and Mail (and via Information Dissemination) comes this infographic of the range of Chinese naval operations:
Now, if both this map and the “Island Chain Theory” of Chinese strategy are accepted as true, then perhaps China is not as far along as recently thought. China has uncontested control of neither the South China Sea nor the Luzon-Okinawa-Kiyakyushu chain. But is that slow progress the result of capabilities or intent?
The PLAN has grown more than was previously thought, but much of that growth has come from additional submarines – not the most effective offensive weapon to claim and hold territory. Still, it would not be especially difficult for China to assert themselves more unilaterally in the South China Sea especially – the other ASEAN nations have virtually no navies and little recourse to international fora to decry Chinese expansionism.
And still, while Chinese leadership seems to disdain international standards and mores, there is some respect for general global sentiment towards the country. Isolated instances of repression, jailing dissidents, and other such common phenomena in the People’s Republic barely make it to the A section of major newspapers, and usually just as a sidebar item. Most people would hardly notice unless they were looking for it.
But if a major operation were launched – like one to take and secure the Paracels and the Spratlys, and to start building on them – you can be sure the international outrage would be deafening. And that seems to be what CCP leadership hates the most. Not necessarily being lectured or talked to about human rights, but being yelled at. Regardless, the Chinese position vis-a-vis the first island chain should be seen as soft. It may look underdefended and contested, but the PLAN could easily seize key points along it in a heartbeat. For the moment, at least, there is just no need to do so.
This guide is so very helpful. Something to keep in mind while New START is held hostage in exchange for tax cuts for rich people.
Current political organizations? A template for the future? Either way, it would appear that blocks are the key.
Found without further commentary at fake is the new real.
It seems like good news always comes out when the weather’s bad, and bad news when it’s nice out. But when it’s a grey day to begin with and you look at this series of charts…
What the gap between potential and actual production means for employment.
Basically, a recovery could take 10 more years. Or never materialize at all. Given the devastating effects of long-term unemployment on recent graduates, young adults, and the very fabric of society, we have got to do better. And the stimulus was too much?!
At this point, it doesn’t even matter. Make-work, nothingness – anything is better than the worst-case outcome here.
It’s really difficult to envision just how massive Chinese cities are. From Chinfographics comes this chart of the 60 largest with a population of over 1 million (and including some in Taiwan). Alongside for comparison are other famous world cities – but as you may notice, the population counts there look a bit large. They’re using the metropolitan area population, so New York gets 21.3 million instead of the usual 8.3 million, Boston gets 5.2 million instead of the usual .5-1.3 million, et cetera.
But it is rather mind-blowing just how enormous China is.
Excellent tool to see a quantified list of risks to the international order and the individual nation state, along with their relationships with each other. Interactive version is here.
GOOD just ran another infographic contest. The subject: neighborhoods.
This design from Shane Keaney was possibly my favorite; if you took the entirety of the U.S. population and condensed into an area with the same population density as Brooklyn, you could fit everyone in just the state of New Hampshire. With more parks than Brooklyn.